THE POLITICAL-IDEOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF CONTEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTALISM PRESENT IN THE 2030 AGENDA: GLOBALIZATION VERSUS NATIONALISM

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the ideological aspects of contemporary environmentalist discourse by analyzing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Given that this document is the result of a polarized context, the question is: does the 2030 Agenda contain guidelines that seek to subvert the Judeo-Christian foundations of Western culture and impose a new mental paradigm, according to the principles of cultural Marxism? The thesis here is that the text is contrary to the conservative paradigm of homeland and family, and that this is a consequence of Cultural Marxism. The real objective of the 2030 Agenda is to spread a neo-Marxist government worldwide, along the following lines: a) in political terms, to eliminate the autonomy of nations and the concept of homeland, through the encouragement of migration and multiracial policies, attempting to create a social-democratic world government that promises equality, peace and prosperity; b) in economic terms, defense of trade regulated by transnational entities that impede the economic evolution of underdeveloped nations and that encourage aid only to nations that change their ancestral ways of living; c) in cultural terms, it propagates cultural Marxism, creating a psychologically and spiritually fragile society. Voloshinov's (2018) sociological method was used, emphasizing the implicit ideological substrates that Agenda 2030 has. The study was conducted in the following order: 1) Contextual: the influence of neo-Marxism on culture was analyzed; 2) Evaluative: the merely literal and formal aspects were transcended to reach the subliminal and implicit aspects of the text, by placing the thematic statements contained in Agenda 2030 in contrast with contextual antagonisms.